Defining moment for Comey in Clinton call – The Hill

James Comey went from the political frying pan to the fire Tuesday when the FBI chief announced that he would not recommend pressing charges against Hillary ClintonHillary Rodham ClintonDefining moment for Comey in Clinton call Jewish voters could tip swing states Hillary Clinton’s way New student debt rules trigger frenzy MORE over her use of a private email server while secretary of State.

Comey’s address to the media will long be remembered as one of the most significant news events of the 2016 presidential cycle. An indictment of Clinton would have upended the race, leaving Democrats scrambling to either defend her or seek a new nominee such as Sen. Bernie SandersBernie SandersDefining moment for Comey in Clinton call Trump: Sanders ‘lost the FBI primary’ Overnight Finance: Trump’s fight with the global elite | Dems want details on derivatives | EU bitcoin crackdown | Warren beefs up financial agenda MORE (I-Vt.) or Vice President Biden.

Comey and the bureau had been buffered by turbulent political currents while the yearlong probe ran its course. There was no doubt that roughly half the country would take umbrage at whatever decision was arrived at, especially now that Clinton is the presumptive Democratic nominee for president.

Not surprisingly, Comey’s decision not to indict was met with trenchant criticism from Republicans and conservatives.

Speaker Paul RyanPaul RyanDefining moment for Comey in Clinton call Dems vow to press for more gun votes Ryan: GOP will hold hearings on Clinton probe MORE (Wis.), the highest-ranking GOP officeholder in the country, issued a statement asserting that the decision not to indict “defies explanation.”

Plenty of other Republicans piled on. Sen. Rand PaulRand PaulDefining moment for Comey in Clinton call The Trail 2016: Judgment day Furious GOP lashes out at FBI MORE (R-Ky.) tweeted that the decision was “astounding.” Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus alleged that “the Obama Administration … were never going to prosecute Clinton’s criminal behavior.” House majority whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) said that it was “beyond comprehension” why Clinton would not face criminal charges.

Comey, 55, has plenty of experience in withstanding political pressure. A Republican, he served in former President George W. Bush’s administration as deputy attorney general. But his most famous action during that period was rushing to the hospital room of ailing Attorney General John Ashcroft as part of a last-ditch effort to resist approving a particular spying program run by the National Security Agency.

Comey, who contributed to the Republican presidential campaigns of Sen. John McCainJohn McCainDefining moment for Comey in Clinton call Taking a stance on Trump Decision time for Trump on VP MORE (Ariz.) in 2008 and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney in 2012, has also frustrated the Obama administration while in his current role, warning about “gaps” in the screening process for Syrian refugees and linking rising rates of violent crime to the Black Lives Matter movement.

As he strode to the lectern on Tuesday morning, the 6-foot-8-inch Comey was well aware he was igniting another political firestorm three weeks before the Democratic National Convention and four months before the general election.

Comey has had plenty of experience investigating high-profile figures, including lifestyle guru Martha Stewart, former CIA chief David Petraeus and the late Sandy Berger, who served as former President Clinton’s national security adviser.

On top of the basic question of whether Clinton would be indicted, Bill ClintonBill ClintonDefining moment for Comey in Clinton call Trump accuses Clinton of bribing Lynch Webb: Hillary cannot be POTUS MORE had added more kindling with his contentious foray onto the private jet of Attorney General Loretta Lynch — technically, Comey’s boss — a little more than a week ago. In the wake of the 30-minute conversation between the former president and the attorney general becoming public, Lynch announced that she would accept whatever course the FBI recommended regarding Hillary Clinton.

Comey was at pains Tuesday to insist that there had been no political pressure placed on the bureau he leads.

At the outset of his statement, he said that he had “not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of government. They do not know what I am about to say.”

He closed with an assertion that the FBI had worked in “an entirely apolitical” way. 

“What I can assure the American people is that this investigation was done competently, honestly and independently,” he said. “No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.”

Some experts argued that Comey had walked the high wire as steadily as could be reasonably expected.

“I think very highly of him. He is an incredibly thoughtful, experienced person. He is the right guy to have. I don’t think he was fazed by the politics,” said Ron Hosko, president of the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund and a former assistant director of the FBI.

But Hosko also hinted that he himself had been surprised that the harsh criticism Comey leveled at Clinton did not lead to a recommendation to indict.

Referring to Comey’s Tuesday morning remarks, he said, “For the first three-quarters of it, he was crafting an indictment of Hillary Clinton’s actions. … It felt like an indictment.”

While Comey would deny any balancing of political imperatives, it is nonetheless a fact that his decision to not press for indictment was accompanied by several damning findings — most notably that Clinton and her colleagues had been “extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”

Referring to email exchanges that included classified information, Comey also asserted, “There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position … should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.”

If those findings provided some welcome ammunition for Clinton’s foes, they also drew protests from some quarters.

Matt Miller, who served as a Department of Justice spokesman during Eric HolderEric H. HolderDefining moment for Comey in Clinton call FBI director takes center stage in Clinton email case Lynch: I wouldn’t do Clinton meeting over again MORE’s tenure as attorney general, told The Hill that he found Comey’s news conference “appalling.” Miller argued that the director’s actions breached a standard practice of only laying out accusations of misdeeds at length if charges are actually going to be brought in court — where they can also potentially be rebutted.

“Jim Comey basically presented himself as the prosecutor and the ultimate judge and jury,” Miller said. “He is out there passing judgments on facts that the FBI has gathered in a way that is really unfair to Secretary Clinton.”

Still, for now Comey will have to get used to most of the indignation coming from the Republican side.

In a statement released Tuesday afternoon, presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald TrumpDonald TrumpJewish voters could tip swing states Hillary Clinton’s way Defining moment for Comey in Clinton call Taking a stance on Trump MORE said that “because of our rigged system that holds the American people to one standard and people like Hillary Clinton to another, it does not look like she will be facing the criminal charges that she deserves.”

Comments

Write a Reply or Comment:

Your email address will not be published.*